By the time The Lone Ranger arrived on British screens, critics had practically written off this multi-million dollar Western.
The fact it cost so much money to make, and had not done incredible box office figures left many thinking this was the Western version of John Carter, a.k.a. a massive financial disaster.
However, the good news is TLR is a lot of fun - eventually.
The first act certainly isn't one of those feel good cinematic experiences.
Using The Princess Bride narrative technique (an old gentleman narrates his life story to a young listener), Ranger unfolds at a langorous pace.
Hammering the point home that this is the last of the Texas Rangers, we see how the eponymous hero gets to wear that mask, and ride that horse.
Naturally the buddy dynamic between TLR and sidekick Tonto forms the backbone of the movie.
Johnny Depp was the key figure instrumental in getting this film made, so little wonder he steals the show.
His Tonto is wonderfully enigmatic, but there is at least a reason for his eccentricity.
In fact there's a reason just about everyone does what they do in this film.
Sometimes we don't need to know everything about a character to be fascinated by them. Much of the mystique in a film like this stems from not knowing why the Injun sidekick has a dead bird on his head.
If there's a problem with the movie it's the fact the first two acts take ages generating a head of steam for the finale, like the locomotives which feature so heavily throughout.
Yes characters need to be established, and bad guys need to carry out disturbing acts so we root for the protagonist.
However, the sight of Butch Cavendish (William Fichtner) eating the heart of a key character is one of those moments where I think (the aptly named) Gore Verbinski went too far.
Okay, so you don't actually see a knife entering flesh, or see Cavendish eat the heart, but I can only imagine the psychological trauma that might cause younger viewers.
Then again, such gross out moments are what makes kids talk about movies. I doubt anyone would have gone to see Alien if it weren't for the chest burster moment; the buzz at school in 1979 was better than any viral marketing campaign.
So yes, it may be a little dubious in the graphic department, but that said, The Lone Ranger is a lot of fun once it gets going.
The epic vistas of Monument Valley, favoured by John Ford in his classic Westerns, are a fantastic sight on the big screen.
And it's good to see subtle reference to Jodorowsky's classic cult Western El Topo, especially in a Disney film.
This is perhaps Gore's best film since the original Pirates of the Caribbean 10 years ago, and while Armie Hammer playing second fiddle to Depp is a nice touch, it didn't need such a long running time or the army of extras. A leaner story with half the cast would have been just as effective.
On the plus side, Luther's Ruth Wilson is a magnetic screen presence, even if her generic heroine is just another damsel in distress.
It's an old fashioned epic with some brave licks on a well worn genre. Just a shame it takes so long to tell a slender story.
Thursday, 15 August 2013
Sunday, 11 August 2013
Guardians of the Galaxy
What on Earth is Full Tilt?
Interesting turn of phrase. It's Marvel’s megabucks new fantasy adventure with Karen Gillan.
So, a bit like Dr Who then?
Not quite. She's bald.
Who else is in it?
Glenn Close, Zoe Saldana and apparently Vin Diesel’s voice.
Will it be any good?
Obviously too early to tell. Disney bosses are hoping it does Avengers-style box office numbers to make up for epic Lone Ranger misfire. They also hope it's nothing like John Carter. Another misfire.
Who's directing it?
James Gunn.
Who?
He directed fun, icky B movie Slither a few years ago and comic book inspired Super.
Is he any good?
If you like fun epic B movies.
So, Full Tilt. Interesting title.
We’ll be honest. It's not actually called that.
Really? What's the real title?
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Okay. So Marvel banked millions on a movie few have any interest in?
Yes and no.
The original Guardians of the Galaxy first appeared in Marvel Super-Heroes #18 back in January 1969.
So those are the characters we see in the movie?
Major Vance Astro, Martinex T'Naga, Captain Charlie-27, and Yondu Udonta?
Yes
No. This is based on a revamped version from a few years ago, though we imagine there will be the odd in joke for fans of the original.
So why make a film now?
Avengers proved that space fantasy puts bums on seats in the Marvel universe. And there's less expectation. If it fails, Marvel may blame a lack of audience recognition in the brand and press on with another safe Spider-Man movie after Amazing Spider-Man 2, before rebooting that again.
Will GoG be connected to Avengers?
Yes. Zoe Saldana's character is apparently related to Thanos.
Who?
That purple alien in the closing credits of Joss Whedon's movie that some of the fan boys and girls pretended they knew but didn't.
Why are exotic looking people running across the Millennium Bridge?
We guess its because they're on the run from bad guys.
Not because they're fans of that Harry Potter movie featuring the same bridge?
No. Though maybe they are. We don't know what they watch on their planet.
Will Galaxy chocolate feature in the movie?
We doubt it.
Will a clip be featured in one of those ’cookies’ I sit through the endless credits for.
Most definitely.
When?
Possibly Thor: The Dark World or Captain America: Winter Soldier.
Is this the film with a Raccoon character in it?
Yes.
Sounds a bit daft doesn't it?
Hey, it's a comic book movie. You know, for kids.
Yes, but even so. Is it aimed at five-year-olds?
No. Though we imagine they want to see it.
Can we expect a load more ’out there’ Marvel movies?
Possibly. Now that Iron Man, Spider-Man, Thor and Cap have proved bankable commodities, Marvel are taking a few risks with lesser known material.
So things like classic comics Doctor Strange and a Silver Surfer movie?
We can but hope.
And a proper Fantastic Four film?
Hopefully. That's being rebooted now.
And Howard the Duck?
Don't hold your breath.
Who plays who?
Chris Pratt: Peter Quill/Star-Lord.
Zoe Saldana: Gamora, adopted daughter of Thanos.
Dave Bautista: Drax the Destroyer.
Lee Pace: Ronan the Accuser.
Michael Rooker: Yondu.
Karen Gillan: Nebula.
Djimon Hounsou:Korath.
Benicio del Toro: The Collector.
John C. Reilly: Rhomann Dey.
Glenn Close: Nova Prime.
Now I know all this, will The Big Bang Theory make lots of hip cross references?
Doubtful. Unless Guardians was a DC Comic.
Can I see a clip?
Sure, go here:
http://youtu.be/GMvbPd0R-eE
August 11, 2013, Millennium Bridge London.
If you liked the sight of Millennium Bridge under attack from Dementors, then watch and Marvel as lots of worried folks run across it for their 2014 blockbuster Guardians of the Galaxy.
No sign of a bald Karen Gillan alas.
Interesting turn of phrase. It's Marvel’s megabucks new fantasy adventure with Karen Gillan.
So, a bit like Dr Who then?
Not quite. She's bald.
Who else is in it?
Glenn Close, Zoe Saldana and apparently Vin Diesel’s voice.
Will it be any good?
Obviously too early to tell. Disney bosses are hoping it does Avengers-style box office numbers to make up for epic Lone Ranger misfire. They also hope it's nothing like John Carter. Another misfire.
Who's directing it?
James Gunn.
Who?
He directed fun, icky B movie Slither a few years ago and comic book inspired Super.
Is he any good?
If you like fun epic B movies.
So, Full Tilt. Interesting title.
We’ll be honest. It's not actually called that.
Really? What's the real title?
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Okay. So Marvel banked millions on a movie few have any interest in?
Yes and no.
The original Guardians of the Galaxy first appeared in Marvel Super-Heroes #18 back in January 1969.
So those are the characters we see in the movie?
Major Vance Astro, Martinex T'Naga, Captain Charlie-27, and Yondu Udonta?
Yes
No. This is based on a revamped version from a few years ago, though we imagine there will be the odd in joke for fans of the original.
So why make a film now?
Avengers proved that space fantasy puts bums on seats in the Marvel universe. And there's less expectation. If it fails, Marvel may blame a lack of audience recognition in the brand and press on with another safe Spider-Man movie after Amazing Spider-Man 2, before rebooting that again.
Will GoG be connected to Avengers?
Yes. Zoe Saldana's character is apparently related to Thanos.
Who?
That purple alien in the closing credits of Joss Whedon's movie that some of the fan boys and girls pretended they knew but didn't.
Why are exotic looking people running across the Millennium Bridge?
We guess its because they're on the run from bad guys.
Not because they're fans of that Harry Potter movie featuring the same bridge?
No. Though maybe they are. We don't know what they watch on their planet.
Will Galaxy chocolate feature in the movie?
We doubt it.
Will a clip be featured in one of those ’cookies’ I sit through the endless credits for.
Most definitely.
When?
Possibly Thor: The Dark World or Captain America: Winter Soldier.
Is this the film with a Raccoon character in it?
Yes.
Sounds a bit daft doesn't it?
Hey, it's a comic book movie. You know, for kids.
Yes, but even so. Is it aimed at five-year-olds?
No. Though we imagine they want to see it.
Can we expect a load more ’out there’ Marvel movies?
Possibly. Now that Iron Man, Spider-Man, Thor and Cap have proved bankable commodities, Marvel are taking a few risks with lesser known material.
So things like classic comics Doctor Strange and a Silver Surfer movie?
We can but hope.
And a proper Fantastic Four film?
Hopefully. That's being rebooted now.
And Howard the Duck?
Don't hold your breath.
Who plays who?
Chris Pratt: Peter Quill/Star-Lord.
Zoe Saldana: Gamora, adopted daughter of Thanos.
Dave Bautista: Drax the Destroyer.
Lee Pace: Ronan the Accuser.
Michael Rooker: Yondu.
Karen Gillan: Nebula.
Djimon Hounsou:Korath.
Benicio del Toro: The Collector.
John C. Reilly: Rhomann Dey.
Glenn Close: Nova Prime.
Now I know all this, will The Big Bang Theory make lots of hip cross references?
Doubtful. Unless Guardians was a DC Comic.
Can I see a clip?
Sure, go here:
http://youtu.be/GMvbPd0R-eE
August 11, 2013, Millennium Bridge London.
If you liked the sight of Millennium Bridge under attack from Dementors, then watch and Marvel as lots of worried folks run across it for their 2014 blockbuster Guardians of the Galaxy.
No sign of a bald Karen Gillan alas.
Wednesday, 7 August 2013
Saturday, 3 August 2013
Could Pixar Remake The Jungle Book?
This month one of Disney's best loved animated features is released on Blu-ray.
Their beautifully crafted take on Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book has been a family favourite since the late 1960s.
Helmed by Wolfgang Reitherman, it featured vocal work by his son Bruce; the great Phil Harris as lovable sidekick Baloo, and a superb supporting cast, including George Sanders and Louis Prima.
It's hard to imagine a world in which foot-tappers the Bear Necessities, and I Want to Be Like You did not exist.
Feeling down? Pop those tracks on and you'll be better in no time.
I last saw TJB on the big screen 20 years ago, and despite the odd dated reference, it still seemed like that timeless classic I enjoyed as a kid.
Two years after that 1993 screening, the original Toy Story was released, the first computer-generated animated feature which ushered in a new era for movies.
These days every cartoon feature seems to be CG. The gimmick of seeing rounded, realistic animated figures on the big screen is now just commonplace, so more important than ever is capturing that dynamic which made the original Disney films so enjoyable.
So, would Disney/Pixar ever consider remaking The Jungle Book featuring the original voices?
Some might see it as sacrilege to even consider it, but Walt was always a pioneer, pushing the envelope to re-tell old tales for a new generation.
“Well every movie is absolutely unique,” explains Bruce Reitherman, aka the voice of Mowgli. “Pixar demonstrate there’s nothing about the computer that limits you from making tremendously entertaining and effective films using that computer medium.”
Naturally Bruce is still a huge fan of the human touch with ink, paint and brush, describing hand-drawn animation as “a unique and wonderful legacy of the 20th century”.
Since the Disney company was founded decades ago, it’s been on the cutting edge of technology.
The Black Hole (a flawed but personal favourite) and Tron pioneered CGI more than 30 years ago. They have either spawned a sequels or a pending revamp, so why not remake one of their best loved films for a new generation using the very tools Walt’s company helped promote?
It's hard to imagine a remake without the use of those original fantastic voices and songs, but in an age when computer-generated animation is so high spec, would they want to give it that high gloss sheen more associated with The Incredibles and Wreck-It Ralph?
I think the brain has a hard time going from flat animation to the rounded, computer-generated version; either one or the other, as The Simpsons proved years ago when a CG Homer entered a 3-D world. Though it was a fun experiment, some fans seemed to prefer the original cel animation.
Even if every shot was faithfully recreated in computers, would a CG version of The Jungle Book really manage to capture the classic original's spirit?
It’s a different genre and audience admittedly, but Gus van Sant's almost shot-for-shot remake of Hitchcock's Psycho in the 1990s was a damp squib, proving a copy of a classic loses something in translation.
The same could be true of cel to CGI animation.
Bruce, who also worked with his dad on assorted animated Winnie the Pooh films (he was the voice of Christopher Robin), has spent two decades making wildlife films for companies including the BBC.
He thinks Walt would have embraced CGI ’toons.
“That’s really the thing that drives the studio (Disney) forward and keeps them alive and fresh; making a similar kind of product that’s unique to the time it was made in and has this timeless quality.”
If a CGI Jungle Book were made, a generation with no expectations of the original would probably embrace it with open arms. After all, it's purists who grew up with the original movie that might have a problem, not the newcomers.
Bruce is on the money when he says, “The attitude of the Disney studio is keep pushing the thing forward; keep adopting the newest, greatest stuff.”
He’s well aware that the origins of Disney were in a time when feature animation did not exist: “You had to invent it, or at least perfect it to the point where people would watch it, so that pioneering spirit is something that still drives the studio and I’m happy for it,” he explains.
These days Bruce divides his time between conserving wild and agricultural land in Santa Barbara, California; offering advice as a wildlife biology consultant on various endangered species and bird surveys, and also does “a bit of architectural photography”.
However, for millions he will always be the voice of that ’man cub’ who taught us all about the Bear Necessities of entertainment, and life: great characters, a good story, and the occasional foot-tapping dance routine/musical number thrown in for good measure.
Today's filmmakers could do worse than take notes as they watch one of the last, best films Walt oversaw. It's a masterclass in entertainment, and personally i think it could only be enhanced by a Pixar revamp.
The Jungle Book is released on Blu-ray in the UK on August 5.
Their beautifully crafted take on Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book has been a family favourite since the late 1960s.
Helmed by Wolfgang Reitherman, it featured vocal work by his son Bruce; the great Phil Harris as lovable sidekick Baloo, and a superb supporting cast, including George Sanders and Louis Prima.
It's hard to imagine a world in which foot-tappers the Bear Necessities, and I Want to Be Like You did not exist.
Feeling down? Pop those tracks on and you'll be better in no time.
I last saw TJB on the big screen 20 years ago, and despite the odd dated reference, it still seemed like that timeless classic I enjoyed as a kid.
Two years after that 1993 screening, the original Toy Story was released, the first computer-generated animated feature which ushered in a new era for movies.
These days every cartoon feature seems to be CG. The gimmick of seeing rounded, realistic animated figures on the big screen is now just commonplace, so more important than ever is capturing that dynamic which made the original Disney films so enjoyable.
So, would Disney/Pixar ever consider remaking The Jungle Book featuring the original voices?
Some might see it as sacrilege to even consider it, but Walt was always a pioneer, pushing the envelope to re-tell old tales for a new generation.
“Well every movie is absolutely unique,” explains Bruce Reitherman, aka the voice of Mowgli. “Pixar demonstrate there’s nothing about the computer that limits you from making tremendously entertaining and effective films using that computer medium.”
Naturally Bruce is still a huge fan of the human touch with ink, paint and brush, describing hand-drawn animation as “a unique and wonderful legacy of the 20th century”.
Since the Disney company was founded decades ago, it’s been on the cutting edge of technology.
The Black Hole (a flawed but personal favourite) and Tron pioneered CGI more than 30 years ago. They have either spawned a sequels or a pending revamp, so why not remake one of their best loved films for a new generation using the very tools Walt’s company helped promote?
It's hard to imagine a remake without the use of those original fantastic voices and songs, but in an age when computer-generated animation is so high spec, would they want to give it that high gloss sheen more associated with The Incredibles and Wreck-It Ralph?
I think the brain has a hard time going from flat animation to the rounded, computer-generated version; either one or the other, as The Simpsons proved years ago when a CG Homer entered a 3-D world. Though it was a fun experiment, some fans seemed to prefer the original cel animation.
Even if every shot was faithfully recreated in computers, would a CG version of The Jungle Book really manage to capture the classic original's spirit?
It’s a different genre and audience admittedly, but Gus van Sant's almost shot-for-shot remake of Hitchcock's Psycho in the 1990s was a damp squib, proving a copy of a classic loses something in translation.
The same could be true of cel to CGI animation.
Bruce, who also worked with his dad on assorted animated Winnie the Pooh films (he was the voice of Christopher Robin), has spent two decades making wildlife films for companies including the BBC.
He thinks Walt would have embraced CGI ’toons.
“That’s really the thing that drives the studio (Disney) forward and keeps them alive and fresh; making a similar kind of product that’s unique to the time it was made in and has this timeless quality.”
If a CGI Jungle Book were made, a generation with no expectations of the original would probably embrace it with open arms. After all, it's purists who grew up with the original movie that might have a problem, not the newcomers.
Bruce is on the money when he says, “The attitude of the Disney studio is keep pushing the thing forward; keep adopting the newest, greatest stuff.”
He’s well aware that the origins of Disney were in a time when feature animation did not exist: “You had to invent it, or at least perfect it to the point where people would watch it, so that pioneering spirit is something that still drives the studio and I’m happy for it,” he explains.
These days Bruce divides his time between conserving wild and agricultural land in Santa Barbara, California; offering advice as a wildlife biology consultant on various endangered species and bird surveys, and also does “a bit of architectural photography”.
However, for millions he will always be the voice of that ’man cub’ who taught us all about the Bear Necessities of entertainment, and life: great characters, a good story, and the occasional foot-tapping dance routine/musical number thrown in for good measure.
Today's filmmakers could do worse than take notes as they watch one of the last, best films Walt oversaw. It's a masterclass in entertainment, and personally i think it could only be enhanced by a Pixar revamp.
The Jungle Book is released on Blu-ray in the UK on August 5.
Sunday, 28 July 2013
The Wolverine - The Review
It's hard to relate to a superhero who doesn't bleed, or if he does, not for long. Which is why the sixth outing for Hugh Jackman’s razor-clawed Canadian Logan, aka Wolverine, is partly a welcome breath of fresh air.
Robbed of his healing powers (yes, like Superman II), he becomes cause for concern as bullets suddenly hurt after all these years.
Setting it in Japan was also a wise move.
Since 2000, we've seen Wolverine tackle assorted villains in the States, so good to get a change of scene.
The first two thirds of James Mangold’s movie are a stylish, occasionally thoughtful affair, with our hirsute hero first clashing with generic bad bear hunters, and then sent East to be reunited with the Japanese officer he saved from nuclear death at Nagasaki.
Orbiting around these two men are assorted relatives, ninjas, yakuza, and the odd acid-spitting mutant (Svetlana Khodchenkova) who chews every scene she's in, and refuses to look embarrassed by an absurd green costume in the third act.
Sadly, it’s that final chunk that becomes Marvel-by-numbers: boss monster, aka a giant robot samurai; massive smack down, heat and serve.
I love Marvel films and robots as much as any fan, but they really need to add a few different colours to their generic antagonist palette. Chrome has been used on their cinematic canvas for way too long.
While there are echoes of assorted other films, such as Eastern-themed Bond epic You Only Live Twice, the disappointing Prometheus also reared its ugly head thanks to a wince-inducing self surgery scene and an ageing protagonist’s machinations. (No spoilers but all will become clear).
Thankfully it's far better than X-Men Origins, and The Last Stand, but X2 still stands as the saga’s high point.
Added to the mix are alluring, flame-haired aide Yukio (Rila Fukushima) and key heroine Mariko (Tao Okamoto).
They help tame the eponymous beast, and are a welcome distraction from the orgy of slashes and gunshots.
Good to see Famke Janssen back as ex-X-Man Jean Grey too, albeit as a ghostly presence and with a weird digital anti-ageing makeover reminiscent of Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen’s CGI anti-wrinkle treatment from X3.
Just a shame it’s all so meh. There are no sucker punch moments that get under the skin, and some of the dialogue is yawnsome. However, an action scene atop a bullet train adds a few fresh licks to the sense of Mission: Impossible déjà vu.
Stay tuned for the now obligatory credits teaser for the next key Marvel outing, in this case next year’s X-Men: Days of Future Past. Thankfully you won't have to stay through the entire credits trawl for the privilege either.
Not as much fun as Iron Man 3, or as ponderous as Man of Steel, but good escapism for a dull Sunday afternoon.
Robbed of his healing powers (yes, like Superman II), he becomes cause for concern as bullets suddenly hurt after all these years.
Setting it in Japan was also a wise move.
Since 2000, we've seen Wolverine tackle assorted villains in the States, so good to get a change of scene.
The first two thirds of James Mangold’s movie are a stylish, occasionally thoughtful affair, with our hirsute hero first clashing with generic bad bear hunters, and then sent East to be reunited with the Japanese officer he saved from nuclear death at Nagasaki.
Orbiting around these two men are assorted relatives, ninjas, yakuza, and the odd acid-spitting mutant (Svetlana Khodchenkova) who chews every scene she's in, and refuses to look embarrassed by an absurd green costume in the third act.
Sadly, it’s that final chunk that becomes Marvel-by-numbers: boss monster, aka a giant robot samurai; massive smack down, heat and serve.
I love Marvel films and robots as much as any fan, but they really need to add a few different colours to their generic antagonist palette. Chrome has been used on their cinematic canvas for way too long.
While there are echoes of assorted other films, such as Eastern-themed Bond epic You Only Live Twice, the disappointing Prometheus also reared its ugly head thanks to a wince-inducing self surgery scene and an ageing protagonist’s machinations. (No spoilers but all will become clear).
Thankfully it's far better than X-Men Origins, and The Last Stand, but X2 still stands as the saga’s high point.
Added to the mix are alluring, flame-haired aide Yukio (Rila Fukushima) and key heroine Mariko (Tao Okamoto).
They help tame the eponymous beast, and are a welcome distraction from the orgy of slashes and gunshots.
Good to see Famke Janssen back as ex-X-Man Jean Grey too, albeit as a ghostly presence and with a weird digital anti-ageing makeover reminiscent of Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen’s CGI anti-wrinkle treatment from X3.
Just a shame it’s all so meh. There are no sucker punch moments that get under the skin, and some of the dialogue is yawnsome. However, an action scene atop a bullet train adds a few fresh licks to the sense of Mission: Impossible déjà vu.
Stay tuned for the now obligatory credits teaser for the next key Marvel outing, in this case next year’s X-Men: Days of Future Past. Thankfully you won't have to stay through the entire credits trawl for the privilege either.
Not as much fun as Iron Man 3, or as ponderous as Man of Steel, but good escapism for a dull Sunday afternoon.
Tuesday, 23 July 2013
Luther - season finale review
So the third series of Luther is done and dusted, and what a finale.
By now you've either seen it, about to watch on catch up, or have wandered onto this section by accident.
Safe to say, there are mild spoilers ahead.
As ever, this was another showcase for Idris Elba, an actor so compelling, he should be goalkeeper for England at the next World Cup; he just needs to show up and can save anything.
An army of ILM effects experts worked for months to create the huge robots in Pacific Rim and Idris managed to overshadow them all.
Obviously Luther is made for a fraction of that film's budget; Idris’s Stacker Pentecost’s costume probably cost as much to make as the final ep of the BBC’s compelling crime drama.
Naturally writer Neil Cross saved the best for last, playing his ace card Alice, the posh psycho killer millions hate to love and vice versa.
Effortlessly played by Ruth Wilson, Alice’s greatest crime was to steal the best dialogue.
In a genre littered with cliches, she tap danced around any plot holes with the skill of a seasoned hoofer.
Okay, like any drama, it wasn't perfect.
There was the odd moment I started grumbling at the TV, namely during Mary's desperate search for a key while standing in front of a plate glass door.
I don’t know about you, but if someone's coming after me with a shotgun, I wouldn't let a pane of glass stand in the way. I’d smash it with the nearest thing to hand and start running like Jess Ennis on Super Saturday until the eloquent psycho gunman du jour is a safe distance away.
I won't bother you with the ups and downs of the second act as this was all about the finale, and like far too many thrillers, it resorted to the obvious: scale a tall building and face an impossible dilemma before the authorities show up.
Taking a leaf out of the Life on Mars and Sherlock BBC guidebook to series finales, Luther may not have been staggeringly original, but thanks to the scenery-chewing performances of Idris and Ruth, it didn't matter a jot.
Given the choice between saving girlfriend Mary and psycho femme fatale Alice, poor Luther was understandably torn.
Thankfully, Alice literally nailed her chance to escape when the possibility arose, and the result was more edge-of-the-seat drama than edge-of-the-sky rise.
There's been talk of an Alice spin-off project, which is not a bad idea. Ms Wilson is magnetic in the role of her life, and who wouldn't want to see Idris guest star in that for a short spell instead of carrying a series on his formidable shoulders?
Now the series trilogy is over, for my money it’s time to give Idris the big screen vehicle he deserves.
Given the nail-biting/slashing touches of this run, it could be something incredible.
And if you need an investor BBC Films, I'll happily shell out for a new coat.
It has to be a lot cheaper than Stacker Pentecost’s Pacific Rim threads.
Luther: series three is released on DVD on July 29
By now you've either seen it, about to watch on catch up, or have wandered onto this section by accident.
Safe to say, there are mild spoilers ahead.
As ever, this was another showcase for Idris Elba, an actor so compelling, he should be goalkeeper for England at the next World Cup; he just needs to show up and can save anything.
An army of ILM effects experts worked for months to create the huge robots in Pacific Rim and Idris managed to overshadow them all.
Obviously Luther is made for a fraction of that film's budget; Idris’s Stacker Pentecost’s costume probably cost as much to make as the final ep of the BBC’s compelling crime drama.
Naturally writer Neil Cross saved the best for last, playing his ace card Alice, the posh psycho killer millions hate to love and vice versa.
Effortlessly played by Ruth Wilson, Alice’s greatest crime was to steal the best dialogue.
In a genre littered with cliches, she tap danced around any plot holes with the skill of a seasoned hoofer.
Okay, like any drama, it wasn't perfect.
There was the odd moment I started grumbling at the TV, namely during Mary's desperate search for a key while standing in front of a plate glass door.
I don’t know about you, but if someone's coming after me with a shotgun, I wouldn't let a pane of glass stand in the way. I’d smash it with the nearest thing to hand and start running like Jess Ennis on Super Saturday until the eloquent psycho gunman du jour is a safe distance away.
I won't bother you with the ups and downs of the second act as this was all about the finale, and like far too many thrillers, it resorted to the obvious: scale a tall building and face an impossible dilemma before the authorities show up.
Taking a leaf out of the Life on Mars and Sherlock BBC guidebook to series finales, Luther may not have been staggeringly original, but thanks to the scenery-chewing performances of Idris and Ruth, it didn't matter a jot.
Given the choice between saving girlfriend Mary and psycho femme fatale Alice, poor Luther was understandably torn.
Thankfully, Alice literally nailed her chance to escape when the possibility arose, and the result was more edge-of-the-seat drama than edge-of-the-sky rise.
There's been talk of an Alice spin-off project, which is not a bad idea. Ms Wilson is magnetic in the role of her life, and who wouldn't want to see Idris guest star in that for a short spell instead of carrying a series on his formidable shoulders?
Now the series trilogy is over, for my money it’s time to give Idris the big screen vehicle he deserves.
Given the nail-biting/slashing touches of this run, it could be something incredible.
And if you need an investor BBC Films, I'll happily shell out for a new coat.
It has to be a lot cheaper than Stacker Pentecost’s Pacific Rim threads.
Luther: series three is released on DVD on July 29
Friday, 19 July 2013
The World's End Review - variant
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/roger-crow/the-worlds-end-review_b_3622395.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




